4.2 Article

Influence of ambient temperature on erosion properties of exposed cohesive sediment from an intertidal mudflat

Journal

GEO-MARINE LETTERS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 337-347

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00367-019-00579-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Waikato Doctoral Scholarship
  2. Tipping Points project in the Dynamic Seas programme of the New Zealand Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge [CO1x1515 4.2.1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intertidal flats regularly emerge and submerge in accordance with changes to the water level occurring over tidal cycles. The alteration between wet and drained states may affect the sediment water content, and so the erosion properties of intertidal sediments. This study examined the influence of ambient temperature on the erodibility of exposed cohesive sediment from an intertidal mudflat in the Firth of Thames, New Zealand, in December 2017 and March 2018. The EROMES device was used to measure the erosion potential of sediment (erosion threshold, tau(cr) Nm(-2), and erosion rate, ER gm(-2)s(-1)). Samples were drained and exposed to temperatures of 0, 8, 25 and 40 degrees C, chosen to mimic natural exposed conditions, while submerged samples simulated natural flooded conditions. Results showed that the cohesive sediment became more resistant to erosion when exposed to air compared with submerged samples as a consequence of decreased water content. The water content of exposed sediments decreased by 1.01-1.78 times, a rate which was a function of increasing temperature. The tau(cr) of exposed experiments was 1.2 to 2.2 times higher, whereas ER decreased 1.2 to 6.2 times. Both the December 2017 and March 2018 sampling dates showed a similar pattern of increasing resistance to erosion (higher tau(cr) and lower ER), which corresponded to depleted water content of the exposed sediment at higher temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available