4.7 Article

Effect of extraction temperature on the gelling properties and identification of porcine gelatin

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 163-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.01.059

Keywords

Porcine gelatin; Extraction temperature; Identification; High-resolution mass spectrometry; Gelling properties

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0901101]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31660487, 31860428]
  3. Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-45]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and linear-ion trap (LTQ)/Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry were used to identify porcine gelatins extracted at different temperatures. Moreover, shear stress rheological detection techniques and a texture analyzer were applied to evaluate the gelling properties of various porcine gelatins. The results showed that, with an increased in the extraction temperature, the gel strength, gelation point and melting point of the porcine gelatin gradually decreased, indicating that the temperature significantly affected the gelling properties of gelatin. HPLC-LTQ/Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry indicated that porcine gelatins prepared at different extraction temperatures also showed internal uniqueness, namely, diverse marker peptides for gelatin identification. Compared with the established theoretical sequence fragment database of porcine gelatin and bovine gelatin, 64, 74 and 71 tryptic porcine peptides in gelatins were extracted at 55 degrees C, 65 degrees C and 75 degrees C, respectively. Notably, regardless of the extraction temperature, 47 common peptides were detected in the tryptic hydrolysates of porcine gelatins. Using these common tryptic peptides can effectively improve the accuracy of the porcine gelatin identification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available