4.4 Article

Acute effects of very low-volume high-intensity interval training on muscular fatigue and serum testosterone level vary according to age and training status

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 8, Pages 1725-1733

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04162-1

Keywords

Anabolic response; Low-frequency fatigue; High-intensity interval training; Sprint interval training

Funding

  1. Research Council of Lithuania [SEN-08/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo compare the acute physiological responses of three different very low-volume cycling sessions (6x5s, 3x30s, and 3x60s) and their dependence on age and training status.MethodsSubjects were untrained young men (meanSD; age 22.34.6years, VO(2)peak 42.4 +/- 5.5ml/kg/min, n=10), older untrained men (69.9 +/- 6.3years, 26.5 +/- 7.6ml/kg/min, n=11), and endurance-trained cyclists (26.4 +/- 9.4years, 55.4 +/- 6.6ml/kg/min, n=10). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and electrically stimulated knee extension torque, and low-frequency fatigue, as ratio of stimulation torques at 20-100Hz (P20/100), were measured only 24h after exercise. Serum testosterone (Te) and blood lactate concentrations were measured only 1h after exercise.Results All protocols increased the blood lactate concentration and decreased MVC and P20/100 in young men, but especially young untrained men. In old untrained men, 6x5s decreased P20/100 but not MVC. Te increased after 3x30s and 3x60s in young untrained men and after 3x60s in older untrained men. The increase in Te correlated with responses of blood lactate concentration, MVC, and P20/100 only in old untrained men.Conclusions As little as 6x5s all-out cycling induced fatigue in young and old untrained and endurance-trained cyclists. Slightly higher-volume sessions with longer intervals, however, suppressed contractile function more markedly and also transiently increased serum testosterone concentration in untrained men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available