4.7 Article

Study of biological and thermo-chemical pretreatment of organic fraction of municipal solid waste for enhanced biogas yield

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages 27293-27304

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05695-w

Keywords

Municipal solid waste; Volatile fatty acid; Soluble chemical oxygen demand; Box-Behnken design; Response surface methodology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biogas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) not only helps in solid waste management but also combat the food vs fuel dilemma. The presence of lignocellulosic material and other complex compounds in OFMSW hinder biogas production. Therefore, pretreatment is an essential step to increase the hydrolysis rate by converting complex compounds to simpler ones. This work was aimed at effective pretreatment of OFMSW by biological and thermo-chemical means. For biological pretreatment lignin degrading fungal strains,Phanerochaete chrysosporiumandPleurotus ostreatuswere employed. Thermo-chemical treatment resulted in higher solubilisation yield in terms of sCOD and VFA making it a more effective method as compared with biological pretreatment. The optimisation of thermo-chemical pretreatment was done by the Box-Behnken design of response surface methodology (RSM). The interactive effect of influencing factors NaOH dose, temperature and time were studied on the response of sCOD, VFA and phenolic content. The sCOD and VFA values were significantly increased by increasing the NaOH concentration, temperature and time to a certain limit. The optimised condition from RSM for maximum solubilisation yield in terms of sCOD, VFA and phenolic content was found to be NaOH dose of 4.72 g/L, temperature 180 degrees C and time 30.3 min. Biogas production was increased by 169.5% after pretreatment at RSM optimised conditions as compared with untreated OFMSW.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available