4.8 Article

Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Geothermal Fluids through Bacterial Cell Surface Adsorption

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 13, Pages 7714-7723

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Geothermal Office
  2. Livermore Graduate Scholar Program from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  3. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DEAC52-07NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-751666]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing demand for rare earth elements (REEs) in the modern economy motivates the development of novel strategies for cost-effective REE recovery from non-traditional feedstocks. We previously engineered E. coli to express lanthanide binding tags on the cell surface, which increased the REE biosorption capacity and selectivity. Here we examined how REE adsorption by the engineered E. coli is affected by various geochemical factors relevant to geothermal fluids, including total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, pH, and the presence of specific competing metals. REE biosorption is robust to TDS, with high REE recovery efficiency and selectivity observed with TDS as high as 165,000 ppm. Among several metals tested, U, Al, and Pb were found to be the most competitive, causing >25% reduction in REE biosorption when present at concentrations to similar to 3- to11-fold higher than the REEs. Optimal REE biosorption occurred between pH 5-6, and sorption capacity was reduced by similar to 65% at pH 2. REE recovery efficiency and selectivity increased as a function of temperature up to similar to 70 degrees C due to the thermodynamic properties of metal complexation on the bacterial surface. Together, these data define the optimal and boundary conditions for biosorption and demonstrate its potential utility for selective REE recovery from geofluids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available