4.4 Article

Enhancing methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure and barley: Link between process parameters and microbial community dynamics

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ep.13292

Keywords

anaerobic digestion; barley; cow manure; microbial community; rumen fluid

Funding

  1. Bogazici University Research Fund [16Y00P1]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [105Y597]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of selected process parameters (i.e., temperature, inoculum to substrate ratio [I:S], and inoculum source) on methane production and microbial community structure were investigated in lignocellulose-based anaerobic digestion tests. The results highlighted that dynamic response of microbial communities in changing process parameters subsequently affected anaerobic digestion performance. Co-inoculation of cow rumen fluid to the seed sludge improved the methane yield by 18%. The overall highest methane yield (278 mL CH4/g volatile solids) was obtained when cow rumen fluid was co-inoculated with anaerobic seed sludge with an I:S ratio of 1:2 at mesophilic temperature. Based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing results, Clostridium, Bacteroides, and Bacillus were the predominant bacterial genera in all anaerobic digesters. The highest relative abundances of Clostridum and Bacillus were detected in the thermophilic anaerobic digester. The relative abundance of Rikenella; known for high cellulolytic activity, was significantly higher only in the cow rumen fluid-added digester. Comparatively higher abundances of these lignocellulose-degraders synergistically affected volatile fatty acids as well as methane production in these anaerobic digestion set ups. Methanobacterium was the most abundant methanogen in the digesters inoculated only with anaerobic seed sludge; whereas, Methanobrevibacter dominated the digester that was co-inoculated with cow rumen fluid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available