4.6 Article

Contrasting the Pb (II) and Cd (II) tolerance of Enterobacter sp. via its cellular stress responses

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1507-1516

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14719

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project [2015CB150504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671256]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYZ201712]
  4. Program for Student Innovation Through Research and Training [1713A04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Successful application of microorganisms to heavy metal remediation depends on their resistance to toxic metals. This study contrasted the differences of tolerant mechanisms between Pb2+ and Cd2+ in Enterobacter sp. Microbial respiration and production of formic acid showed that Enterobacter sp. had a higher tolerant concentration of Pb (>1000 mg l(-1)) than Cd (about 200 mg l(-1)). Additionally, SEM confirmed that most of Pb and Cd nanoparticles (NPs) were adsorbed onto cell membrane. The Cd stress, even at low concentration (50 mg l(-1)), significantly enlarged the sizes of cells. The cellular size raised from 0.4 x 1.0 to 0.9 x 1.6 mu m on average, inducing a platelet-like shape. In contrast, Pb cations did not stimulate such enlargement even up to 1000 mg l(-1). Moreover, Cd NPs were adsorbed homogeneously by almost all the bacterial cells under TEM. However, only a few cells work as 'hot spots' on the sorption of Pb NPs. The heterogeneous sorption might result from a 'self-sacrifice' mechanism, i.e., some cells at a special life stage contributed mostly to Pb sorption. This mechanism, together with the lower mobility of Pb cations, caused higher microbial tolerance and removal efficiency towards Pb2+. This study sheds evident contrasts of bacterial resistance to the two most common heavy metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available