4.3 Article

Canopy Cover Shapes Bat Diversity across an Urban and Agricultural Landscape Mosaic

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 193-200

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892919000109

Keywords

Florida; land cover change; multiple species occupancy; acoustic survey; species richness

Funding

  1. State of Florida Wildlife Grants Program
  2. Bat Conservation International
  3. University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project [FLA-WEC-005125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human alteration of the planet's terrestrial landscapes for agriculture, habitation and commerce is reshaping wildlife communities. The threat of land cover change to wildlife is pronounced in regions with rapidly growing human populations. We investigated how species richness and species-specific occurrence of bats changed as a function of land cover and canopy (tree) cover across a rapidly changing region of Florida, USA. Contrary to our predictions, we found negligible effects of agriculture and urban development on the occurrence of all species. In contrast, we found that a remotely sensed metric of canopy cover on a broad scale (25 km(2)) was a good predictor of the occurrence of eight out of ten species. The occurrence of all smaller bats (vespertilionids) in our study increased with 0-50% increases in canopy cover, while larger bats showed different patterns. Occurrence of Brazilian free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) decreased with increasing canopy cover, and Florida bonneted bats (Eumops floridanus) were not influenced by canopy cover. We conclude that remotely sensed measures of canopy cover can provide a more reliable predictor of bat species richness than land-cover types, and efforts to prevent the loss of bat diversity should consider maintaining canopy cover across mosaic landscapes with diverse land-cover types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available