4.7 Article

The effects of credit policy and financial constraints on tangible and research & development investment: Firm-level evidence from China's renewable energy industry

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 438-447

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.005

Keywords

Credit policy; Financial constraint; Investment; R&D; GMM; Firm-level panel analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673236, 71673238]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590432]
  3. Philosophy, Society and Science Planning of Zhejiang Province [18NDJC 139YB]
  4. New Type Key Professional Think Tank of Zhejiang Province, China
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY18G010014, LY16G030017]
  6. First Class Discipline of Zhejiang- A (Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics- Statistics)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the influences of credit policy and financial constraints on tangible and research & development (R&D) investments from China's firm-level renewable energy industry using dynamic panel generalized moments of method (GMM) analysis. China's renewable energy industry has exuberant tangible investments, and its annual R&D investments are increasing. The empirical results demonstrate that firm-specific features, credit policy and financial constraints have significant impacts on the tangible and R&D investments in the renewable energy industry. Greater commercial bank credits, richer liquid assets, higher returns on assets and better investment opportunities may promote renewable energy firms' tangible investments, while more long-run debts and higher bank dependence may reduce their tangible investments. Larger firm sizes, more short-run debts, higher liability leverages, richer liquid assets and greater bank dependence may increase renewable energy firms' R&D investments, while more long-run debt and greater commercial bank credits may decrease their R&D investments according to the results of the study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available