4.7 Article

Competitive Adsorption and Selective Diffusion of CH4 and the Intruding Gases in Coal Vitrinite

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 6971-6982

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00690

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key Program) [51534006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, the adsorption and diffusion of CH4 and the intruding gases in coal were systematically simulated via Monte Carlo. The adsorption selectivity of carbon dioxide over methane (SCO2/CH4, >1) decreases significantly at P < 6 MPa and is kept stable when P > 6 MPa. However, S-N2/(CH4) (<1) monotonously increases with the increasing pressure, temperature, and bulk mole fraction (BMF) of N-2. Both the cross exchange (D-i,D-j) and diagonal diffusion (D-i,D-i) coefficients in the nCO(2) + mCH(4) and nN(2) + mCH(4) systems gradually increase with the increasing temperature. D-i,D-j is far higher than D-i,D-i for these two systems, indicating the weaker coupling strength of gas-gas interactions than the gas-coal interactions. D-11(1) (or D-11(2)) increases while D-22(1) (or D-22(2)) decreases with the increase of CO2 (or N-2) BMF. The swelling ratios of nCO(2) + mCH(4) and nN(2) + mCH(4) increase slightly at temperatures lower than 338 K and significantly at temperatures higher than 338 K, and both of them are positively related to BMFs of CO2 and CH4, respectively. Both S-CO2(/CH4)d and S-N2(/CH4)d increase with the increasing BMF of carbon dioxide and methane, respectively, indicating that the replacement effects of CO2 and N-2 engineering are weightily related to the mole fractions of the invading gases. S-CO2(/CH4)d first increases (<= 398 K) and then decreases (398 < T < 438 K). Concerning the geological conditions, the optimization injection depths were 800-1100 m (7.94-10.88 MPa) and 600-900 m (5.98-8.92 MPa) for carbon dioxide and nitrogen, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available