4.7 Article

Fast pyrolysis of acid-washed oil palm empty fruit bunch for bio-oil production in a bubbling fluidized-bed reactor

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 517-527

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.211

Keywords

Fast pyrolysis; Oil palm empty fruit bunch; Acid washing; Bubbling fluidized-bed reactor

Funding

  1. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT [NRF-2018M1A2A2026257]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2017R1E1A1A01074282]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) contains the inorganic materials such as K, Na, Mg, and Ca, which cause some problems during fast pyrolysis reaction. In this paper, we report the effect of pretreatment by acid washing with dilute nitric acid to both remove the inorganic materials and increase the bio-oil production at fast pyrolysis in a bubbling fluidized-bed reactor. By pretreating dilute nitric acid at EFB, the total liquid yield enhancement was from 52.2 wt% to 63.9 wt% and the char yield reduction was from 39.9 wt% to 41.9 wt% compared to original EFB. Using various analytical tools including elemental analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, pH meter, Karl-Fischer titration, gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance, the properties and components of bio-oil in original EFB and acid-washed EFB samples were investigated. Through analytical tools, the biomass and bio-oil both in original and acid-washed EFB were analyzed to obtain various properties such as compositions, higher heating value, product yield, C-13 NMR spectra, and carbon number. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available