4.7 Article

Evolution of premixed stoichiometric hydrogen/air flame in a closed duct

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 265-271

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.193

Keywords

Hydrogen; Initial pressure; Flame deformation; Pressure wave; Rayleigh-Taylor instability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604121]
  2. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1402000]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science [HZ2018-KF14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments were performed in a narrow duct to scrutinize the evolution of premixed stoichiometric hydrogen/air flame propagation at varied initial pressures. Besides the formation of the classic tulip flame, new stages of flame deformation have been observed using high speed Schlieren photography, e.g. elongated tulip flame and T-shape flame. With decreasing initial pressure, the flame propagation tends to be milder, but the classic tulip shape is of robust appearance at all conditions. The measured characteristic times of flame deformation were compared with the predictions of Bychkov's model. The pressure wave generated upon the flame-wall contact at very early stage does not trigger the classic tulip inversion, but will collide with the flame front modifying the tulip structure after reflection on the end wall. Thereafter, three different types of pressure dynamics are initiated depending on the initial pressure, P-0 >= 0.7 atm, 0.5 <= P-0 <= 0.7 atm, or P-0 <= 0.5 atm. The Rayleigh-Taylor instability primarily accounts for the flame deformation, whose amplitude growth rate, omega is periodic and determined mainly by the flame acceleration, g according to the linear theory. The measured pressure dynamics by sensor is a combined manifestation originating from the flame dynamics, flame-induced flow and pressure waves excited during combustion. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available