4.4 Review

Lobectomy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: indications and follow-up

Journal

ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages R381-R393

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-19-0085

Keywords

thyroid; carcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extent of thyroid surgery for patients with low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), with a primary tumour <4 cm and no extrathyroidal extension (ETE) or lymph node (LN) metastases, has shifted in a more conservative direction. However, clinicopathological risk factors, including microscopic ETE, aggressive histology, vascular invasion in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and intermediate volume of LN metastases, can only be identified after completing thyroid lobectomy. It is controversial whether patients with these risk factors should immediately undergo complete thyroidectomy and/or radioactive iodine remnant ablation or should be monitored without further treatments. Data are conflicting about the prognostic impact of these risk factors on clinical DTC outcomes. Notably, the recurrence rate in patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy is low and the few recurrences that develop during long-term follow-up can readily be detected by neck ultrasonography and treated by salvage surgery with no impact on survival. These findings suggest that a more conservative approach may be a preferred management strategy over immediate completion surgery, despite a slightly higher risk of structural recurrence. Regarding follow-up of post-lobectomy DTC patients, it is reasonable that an initial risk stratification system based on clinicohistological findings be used to guide the short-term follow-up prior to evaluating the response to initial therapy and that the dynamic risk stratification system based on the response to initial therapy be used to guide long-term follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available