4.3 Review

Regulation of replication fork speed: Mechanisms and impact on genomic stability

Journal

DNA REPAIR
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102654

Keywords

DNA replication; Replication forks; DNA damage response; Genome integrity; Fork speed regulatory network; Cancer

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society [R204-A12617]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation [R266-2017-4289]
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF-7016-00313]
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation [16854]
  5. Swedish Research Council [VR-MH 2014-46602-117891-30]
  6. Swedish Cancer Society /Cancerfonden [170176]
  7. Danish National Research Foundation (project CARD) [DNRF 125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replication of DNA is a fundamental biological process that ensures precise duplication of the genome and thus safeguards inheritance. Any errors occurring during this process must be repaired before the cell divides, by activating the DNA damage response (DDR) machinery that detects and corrects the DNA lesions. Consistent with its significance, DNA replication is under stringent control, both spatial and temporal. Defined regions of the genome are replicated at specific times during S phase and the speed of replication fork progression is adjusted to fully replicate DNA in pace with the cell cycle. Insults that impair DNA replication cause replication stress (RS), which can lead to genomic instability and, potentially, to cell transformation. In this perspective, we review the current concept of replication stress, including the recent findings on the effects of accelerated fork speed and their impact on genomic (in)stability. We discuss in detail the Fork Speed Regulatory Network (FSRN), an integrated molecular machinery that regulates the velocity of DNA replication forks. Finally, we explore the potential for targeting FSRN components as an avenue to treat cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available