4.5 Article

Fatigue in children with perinatal stroke: clinical and neurophysiological associations

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 234-240

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14273

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To characterize fatigue in children with hemiparesis with perinatal stroke and explore associations with measures of motor performance and corticospinal excitability. Method Forty-five children (16 females, 29 males), aged 6 to 18 years (mean [SD] 12y [4]), with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed perinatal stroke participated. Associations between fatigue (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 3.0 cerebral palsy module fatigue subscale), motor performance (Assisting Hand Assessment [AHA], Box and Blocks Test, grip strength), and excitability of corticospinal projections to both hands were examined using ranked tests of correlation, robust regression, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results Nearly half of the participants (n=21) reported experiencing fatigue in the previous month. Function in the less affected hand (Box and Blocks Test, grip strength) was correlated with fatigue scores. Participants with preserved ipsilateral projections to the more affected hand had less fatigue, and scores correlated with the excitability of these projections. Fatigue scores were not associated with age, sex, or AHA score. Interpretation Fatigue is common in children with hemiparesis with perinatal stroke and is associated with motor performance and the presence and excitability of ipsilateral corticospinal projections from the contralesional hemisphere to the more affected hand. What this paper adds Fatigue is common in children with hemiparesis with perinatal stroke. Fatigue was associated with motor performance and strength in the less affected, but not the more affected, hand. Fatigue was associated with the presence and excitability of ipsilateral corticospinal projections from the contralesional hemisphere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available