4.6 Review

Designing and transforming yield-stress fluids

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2019.06.002

Keywords

Soft matter; Yield-stress fluid; Design; Engineering; Extension; Thixotropy; Elasticity; Colloids; Emulsions; Polymers; 3D printing; Chemistry; Physics; Rheology; Complex fluids

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under the Materials Research Laboratory at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [DE-FG02-07ER46471]
  2. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review progress in designing and transforming multi-functional yield-stress fluids and give a perspective on the current state of knowledge that supports each step in the design process. We focus mainly on the rheological properties that make yield-stress fluids so useful and the trade-offs which need to be considered when working with these materials. Thinking in terms of design with and design of' yield-stress fluids motivates how we can organize our scientific understanding of this field. Design with involves identification of rheological property requirements independent of the chemical formulation, e.g. for 3D direct-write printing which needs to accommodate a wide range of chemistry and material structures. Design of includes microstructural considerations: conceptual models relating formulation to properties, quantitative models of formulation-structureproperty relations, and chemical transformation strategies for converting effective yield-stress fluids to be more useful solid engineering materials. Future research directions are suggested at the intersection of chemistry, soft-matter physics, and material science in the context of our desire to design useful Theologically-complex functional materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available