4.3 Review

Paediatric sepsis

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 497-504

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000583

Keywords

antimicrobial stewardship; bacteraemia; child; host response; infant; mortality; quality improvement; sepsis; septic shock; severe infection

Funding

  1. Children's Hospital Foundation, Brisbane, Australia
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of New Zealand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Sepsis remains among the leading causes of childhood mortality worldwide. This review serves to highlight key areas of knowledge gain and ongoing controversies pertinent to sepsis in children. Recent findings Several recent publications describe the epidemiology of paediatric sepsis, demonstrating the impact on child health in terms of mortality and morbidity, and the shortcomings of current paediatric sepsis definitions. Although emerging data support the importance of organ dysfunction as a hallmark of paediatric sepsis, the understanding of host susceptibility to sepsis and to sepsis severity remains very limited. Next-generation sequencing and host transcriptomics have the potential to provide new insights into the pathogenesis of sepsis and may enable personalized medicine approaches. Despite good observational data indicating benefit of sepsis recognition and treatment bundles, the evidence for the individual bundle components remains scarce, implying an urgent need for large trials. Recent studies have demonstrated distinct epidemiological patterns pertinent to age groups, healthcare settings, and comorbidities in the era post meningococcal epidemics. Although sepsis quality improvement initiatives have led to substantial outcome improvements, there is urgency for innovative trials to reduce uncertainty around the optimal approach for the recognition and treatment of sepsis in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available