4.8 Review

Selfish Mitonuclear Conflict

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages R496-R511

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [F32GM116361]
  2. NSF [DGE-1321845, MCB 1412260, IOS 1456233]
  3. ARC [FT160100022, DP170100165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondria, a nearly ubiqupnus feature of eukaryotes, are derived from an ancient symbiosis. Despite billions of years of cooperative coevolution - in what is arguably the most important mutualism in the history of life -the persistence of mitochondrial genomes also creates conditions for genetic conflict with the nucleus. Because mitochondrial genomes are present in numerous copies per cell, they are subject to both within- and among-organism levels of selection. Accordingly, 'selfish' genotypes that increase their own proliferation can rise to high frequencies even if they decrease organismal fitness. It has been argued that uniparental (often maternal) inheritance of cytoplasmic genomes evolved to curtail such selfish replication by minimizing within-individual variation and, hence, within-individual selection. However, uniparental inheritance creates conditions for cytonuclear conflict over sex determination and sex ratio, as well as conditions for sexual antagonism when mitochondrial variants increase transmission by enhancing maternal fitness but have the side-effect of being harmful to males (i.e., 'mother's curse'). Here, we review recent advances in understanding selfish replication and sexual antagonism in the evolution of mitochondria! genomes and the mechanisms that suppress selfish interactions, drawing parallels and contrasts with other organelles (plastids) and bacterial endosymbionts that arose more recently. Although cytonuclear conflict is wid :spread across eukaryotes it can be cryptic due to nuclear suppression, highly variable, and 'Ineage-specific, reflecting the diverse I logy of eukaryotes and the varying architectures of their cytoplasmic, genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available