4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of polypyrrole-modified Li5Cr7Ti6O25 with improved rate performance as negative electrode material for Li-ion batteries

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 566-572

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.032

Keywords

Titanate; Polypyrrole; Rate performance; Lithium-ion battery; Negative electrode material

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774002, 51674068]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N182304014]
  3. Opening Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Electrochemical and Magnetochemical Functional Materials [EMFM20182207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pristine Li5Cr7Ti6O25 and polypyrrole-modified Li5Cr7Ti6O25 materials are successfully synthesized by a facile sol-gel process. Based on the X-ray diffraction pattern and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, a homogeneous polypyrrole layer is successfully coated on the surface of Li5Cr7Ti6O25 particles. The polypyrrole modification improves the reversibility and migration ability of lithium intercalation/deintercalation and reduces the charge-transfer reaction resistance. Li5Cr7Ti6O25@ polypyrrole shows higher delithiation/lithiation capacities and more excellent cycling performance at different charge-discharge rates than the pristine one. Li5Cr7Ti6O25@PolYPyrrole delivers a delithiation capacity of 115.9 mAh.g(-1) with 87.23% capacity retention cycled at 10C/3 rate after 300 cycles and a delithiation capacity of 132 mAh g(-1) with 72.2% capacity retention cycled at 20C/3 charge-discharge rate after 150 cycles. Hence, polypyrrole coating can be considered as an effective way to enhance the electrochemical property of Li5Cr7Ti6O25 for advanced Li-ion battery, and the effective design strategy may be used to improve the lithium storage capacity and cycling stability of other Ti-based negative electrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available