4.4 Article

Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation

Journal

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 15-52

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.002

Keywords

Event-related potentials; Error back-propagation; N400; P600; Semantic P600; Learning; Comprehension; Connectionist model; Development; Linguistic adaptation

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Gravitation Grant [024.001.006]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L008955/1]
  3. ESRC [ES/L008955/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L008955/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide a window into how the brain is processing language. Here, we propose a theory that argues that ERPs such as the N400 and P600 arise as side effects of an error-based learning mechanism that explains linguistic adaptation and language learning. We instantiated this theory in a connectionist model that can simulate data from three studies on the N400 (amplitude modulation by expectancy, contextual constraint, and sentence position), five studies on the P600 (agreement, tense, word category, subcategorization and garden-path sentences), and a study on the semantic P600 in role reversal anomalies. Since ERPs are learning signals, this account explains adaptation of ERP amplitude to within-experiment frequency manipulations and the way ERP effects are shaped by word predictability in earlier sentences. Moreover, it predicts that ERPs can change over language development. The model provides an account of the sensitivity of ERPs to expectation mismatch, the relative timing of the N400 and P600, the semantic nature of the N400, the syntactic nature of the P600, and the fact that ERPs can change with experience. This approach suggests that comprehension ERPs are related to sentence production and language acquisition mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available