4.4 Article

On modeling for Kerr black holes: basis learning, QNM frequencies, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients

Journal

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Volume 36, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab2f11

Keywords

gravitational waves; quasi-normal modes; black hole perturbation theory; QNMs; regression; rational functions

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Grant [ST/L000962/1]
  2. European Research Council Consolidator Grant [647839]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [647839] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Models of black hole (BH) properties play an important role in the ongoing direct detection of gravitational waves from BH binaries. One important aspect of model based gravitational wave (GW) detection, and subsequent estimation of source parameters, is the low level modeling of information related to perturbed Kerr black holes. Here, we present new phenomenological methods to model the analytically understood GW spectra (quasi-normal mode frequencies), and harmonic structure of Kerr black holes (mixing coefficients between spherical and spheroidal harmonics). In particular, we present a greedy-multivariate-polynomial (GMVP) regression method and greedy-multivariate-rational (GMVR) regression method for the automated modeling of polynomial and rational functions, respectively. GMVP is used to develop a model for QNM frequencies that explicitly enforces consistency with the extremal Kerr limit. GMVR is used to develop a model for harmonic mixing coefficients for the dominant multipoles with . The models for the mixing coefficients are the first of their kind to consider BH spin to vary between???1 and 1, thus naturally connecting the pro and retrograde modes. We discuss the potential use of these models in current and future GW signal modeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available