4.7 Article

Facile preparation of hydrophilic glutathione modified magnetic nanomaterials for specific enrichment of glycopeptides

Journal

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 2181-2185

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.046

Keywords

Hydrophilic; Glutathione; Magnetic; Enrichment; Glycopeptides

Funding

  1. Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department [20190201079JC]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, JLU
  3. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, Jilin University, China [skIssm2019020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigations of glycosylated proteins or peptides and their related biological pathways provide new possibilities for illuminating the physiological and pathological mechanisms of glycosylation modification. However, open-ended and in-depth analysis of glycoproteomics is usually subjected to the low-abundance of glycopeptides, heterogeneous glycans, and a variety of interference molecules. In order to alleviate the influence of these obstacles, effective preconcentration of glycopeptides are indispensable. Here, we employed a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-based method to universally capture glycopeptides. Glutathione modified magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4@Au-GSH) were synthesized through a simple process and exploited to enrich glycopeptides from complex samples. The prepared materials showed excellent ability to trap glycopeptides from standard glycoproteins digests, low detection limit (10 fmol/mu L), and good selectivity (HRP:BSA = 1:100). These results indicated that glutathione-based magnetic nanoparticles synthesized in this work had great potential for glycopeptides enrichment. (C) 2019 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available