4.7 Article

Enhancing the ionic conductivity in a composite polymer electrolyte with ceramic nanoparticles anchored to charged polymer brushes

Journal

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 831-835

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.009

Keywords

Polymer electrolyte; Polymer brushes; Solid batteries; Nanoparticles; Composite electrolyte

Funding

  1. PULEAD Technology Industry Co., Ltd.
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771018, 21875004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymer electrolytes are essential for next-generation lithium batteries because of their excellent safety record. However, low ionic conductivity is the main obstacle restricting their commercial application. Composites with nanoparticles are a promising route to overcome this obstacle. In this work, lithium polystyrene sulfonate brushes (LiPSS) is anchored to silicon dioxide nanoparticles with chemical bonding using atom transfer radial polymerization (SI-ATRP). The composite polymer electrolytes are made by mixing vinylene carbonate and nanoparticles via a facile in situ polymerization process. The ionic conductivity of composite polymer electrolytes is improved to 7.2 x 10(-4) S/cm at room temperature, which is attributed to the low degree of crystallinity of polymer electrolyte and the fast ion transport on the surfaces of polymer brush layers that act as a conductive network. The composite polymer electrolytes show a wide electrochemical window of approximately 4.5 V vs. Li+/Li and excellent cycling performance retention of approximately 95% after 100 cycles at ambient temperature. The results also prove that surface groups of ceramic nanoparticles are an important way to increase the electrochemical properties of composite polymer electrolytes. (C) 2019 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available