4.7 Article

Dual-channel supply chain equilibrium problems regarding retail services and fairness concerns

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 40, Issue 15-16, Pages 7349-7367

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.03.010

Keywords

Dual-channel supply chain; Fairness concern; Stackelberg game; Value-added service

Funding

  1. Research Fund of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, China [12YJAZH052]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71472133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Channel competition is the inevitable result when a manufacturer adds a direct channel. Retailers must provide value-added services to products at cost to alleviate the intensity of channel conflict. Thus, retailers may exhibit fairness concerns. In this study, we consider a dual-channel supply chain where a manufacturer with a direct channel acts as the leader and a retailer is the follower. We assume that the retailer has fairness concerns and adds additional value to the product. First, without considering the retailer's fairness concerns, we model mixed channels where the manufacturer makes decisions about the wholesale price and the direct price, while the retailer makes decisions about the level of the value-added services and the retail price according to the Stackelberg game. Furthermore, we consider the game model by adding the retailer's fairness concerns and we present the conditions under which the manufacturer and the retailer can achieve optimal equilibrium strategies. We find that channel efficiency grows with increasing customer loyalty to the retail channel and falls with increases in the retailer's fairness concerns. We show that the entire supply chain cannot be coordinated with a constant wholesale price when the retailer provides value-added services and has fairness concerns. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available