4.4 Article

Rational design of peptides with enhanced antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities against cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 1768-1781

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13579

Keywords

antimicrobial peptides; biocompatible; biofilms; dental caries; Streptococcus mutans

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province, China [2018B030311047]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Shenzhen, China [JCYJ20160428142231354]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201804010419]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) is known to be a leading cariogenic pathogen in the oral cavity. Antimicrobial peptides possess excellent properties to combat such pathogens. In this study, we compared the antimicrobial activity of novel linear reutericin 6- and/or gassericin A-inspired peptides and identified LR-10 as the leading peptide. Antibacterial assays demonstrate that LR-10 is more active against S. mutans (3.3 mu M) than many peptide-based agents without resistance selection, capable of killing many oral pathogens, and tolerant of physiological conditions. LR-10 also presented a faster killing rate than chlorhexidine and erythromycin, and appeared to display selective activity against S. mutans within 10 s. S. mutans is usually encased in plaque biofilms. Biofilm inhibitory assays indicated that LR-10 had excellent inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation of S. mutans and biofilm-encased cells in vitro at low concentrations (6.5 mu M). Consistent with most peptides, LR-10 kills S. mutans mainly by disrupting the cell membranes. Notably, both hemolytic activity assays and cytotoxicity tests indicated that LR-10 could keep biocompatible at the effective concentrations. Hence, LR-10 could be a good candidate for clinical treatment of dental caries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available