4.7 Article

In-situ elongated aluminium borate grains toughening WC-1.87 wt % Al2O3-4.13 wt % ZrO2 composite via spark plasma sintering

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 16, Pages 19610-19616

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.208

Keywords

Sintering; Binderless cemented carbide; Toughness and toughening; Aluminium borate whiskers

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474108, 51575193]
  2. Key Project of Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2018B030311051]
  3. Heyuan Science and Technology Project [181106100220510]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a novel way was developed to facilitate the sintering of a binderless cemented carbide with Al2O3 contain while improving its toughness. WC- 1.87 wt % Al2O3- 4.13 wt %ZrO2 cemented carbides with 1 wt % B2O3 as additives were consolidated by high energy ball-milling and spark plasma sintering the as-milled composite powders. The effects of 1 wt % B2O3 content on the sintering behaviour, microstructure and mechanical properties of the obtained cemented carbides were investigated. The presence of B2O3 significantly lowers the sintering temperature by forming liquid phase and react with Al2O3 which contributed to obtaining fully dense specimens at 1350 degrees C and maintains fine grain sizes of WC until the temperature exceeding 1450 degrees C. The sintering temperature of the specimens with optimum mechanical properties has been also reduced comparing that of the original WC- 1.87 wt % Al2O3- 4.13 wt %ZrO2 cemented carbides. Furthermore, the addition of B2O3 triggered the reaction between B2O3 and Al2O3 resulting in forming in-situ elongated aluminium borate grains (A(4)B(2)O(9) and A(18)B(4)O(33) whiskers), which promoted the toughness. The specimens sintered at 1450 degrees C exhibited optimal mechanical properties: the Vickers hardness and fracture toughness were 19.26 GPa and 11.49 MPa m(1/2), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available