4.8 Article

Pan-cancer Convergence to a Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Phenotype that Shares Susceptibilities with Hematological Malignancies

Journal

CANCER CELL
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 17-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.06.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH NCI [R01 CA222877, R01 CA208303, R01 CA205001]
  2. UCLA SPORE in Prostate Cancer [NIH NCI P50 CA092131]
  3. W.M. Keck Foundation
  4. UCLA Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Hal Gaba Director's Fund for Cancer Stem Cell Research
  5. UC Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) [26IP-0036]
  6. UCLA Medical Scientist Training Program [NIH NIGMS T32 GM008042]
  7. Systems and Integrative Biology Training Grant at UCLA [NIH T32 GM008185]
  8. Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award
  9. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UCLA CTSI Grant [UL1TR000124]
  10. UCLA Broad Stem Cell Research Center postdoctoral fellowship
  11. NIH NCI K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Award [K99 CA218731]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small-cell neuroendocrine cancers (SCNCs) are an aggressive cancer subtype. Transdifferentiation toward an SCN phenotype has been reported as a resistance route in response to targeted therapies. Here, we identified a convergence to an SCN state that is widespread across epithelial cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. More broadly, non-SCN metastases have higher expression of SCN-associated transcription factors than non-SCN primary tumors. Drug sensitivity and gene dependency screens demonstrate that these convergent SCNCs have shared vulnerabilities. These common vulnerabilities are found across unannotated SCN-like epithelial cases, small-round-blue cell tumors, and unexpectedly in hematological malignancies. The SCN convergent phenotype and common sensitivity profiles with hematological cancers can guide treatment options beyond tissue-specific targeted therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available