4.5 Review

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of PD-L1 expression in primary breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 178, Issue 1, Pages 17-33

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05371-0

Keywords

Primary breast cancer; PD-L1; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo evaluate the association between PD-L1 expression (PD-L1+) and clinicopathological characteristics and effect on prognosis in primary breast cancer (PBC).MethodsA systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted in November 2018. Studies detecting PD-L1 using immunohistochemistry, and concerning its prognostic or clinicopathological significance in PBC were included. The HR with 95% CI for survival, and the events for clinicopathological features were pooled.ResultsForty-seven studies were included, with a total of 14,367 PBC patients. PD-L1+ tumor cells (TCs) were associated with ductal carcinomas, large tumor size, histological Grade 3 tumors, high Ki-67, ER and PR negative, and triple-negative breast cancer; and also, related to high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-1 expression. PD-L1+ TCs were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS, HR=1.43, 95% CI 1.21-1.70, P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS, HR=1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, P=0.006). And the HRs of PD-L1+ TCs on DFS and OS were higher (1.48 and 1.70, respectively) and homogeneous when using whole tissue section, compared with tumor microarrays. However, PD-L1+ TILs related to better DFS (HR=0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.73, P=0.001) and OS (HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.63, P<0.0001).ConclusionPD-L1 expression on TCs associates with high-risk clinicopathological parameters and poor prognosis in PBC patients, while PD-L1+ TILs may relate to a better survival. Comprehensive assessment of TCs and TILs is required when evaluating the clinical relevance of PD-L1 expression in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available