Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
Xinyu Wu et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
Svjetlana Dosenovic et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)
PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality
Sakshi Sharma et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction
Antonia Jelicic Kadic et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
Penny Whiting et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Con: Meta-analysis: some key limitations and potential solutions
Tonya M. Esterhuizen et al.
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2016)
Moderator's view: Meta-analysis: the best knowledge but not always shining gold
Carmine Zoccali
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2016)
How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review
Nusrat Jahan et al.
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors
Jonathan B. Koffel
PLOS ONE (2015)
Research Trends in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of More than 50 Years of Publication Data
Bui The Hung et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
被撤回的出版物: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (Retracted article. See vol. 135, pg. 2149, 2021)
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2013)
Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
Jeppe Bennekou Schroll et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
How to write a Cochrane systematic review
Lorna K. Henderson et al.
NEPHROLOGY (2010)
Semi-automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency
Andrea L. Chapman et al.
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL (2010)
Systematic Reviews: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Yuhong Yuan et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2009)
Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy
Anne M. Moseley et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments
Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2009)
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials
J. Pildal et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)
High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews
AP Jones et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Variable reporting and quantitative reviews: a comparison of three meta-analytical techniques
MJ Lajeunesse et al.
ECOLOGY LETTERS (2003)
Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users
D Andrews et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (2003)
Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
EM Balk et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys
C Cook et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2000)