4.7 Article

EFL1 mutations impair eIF6 release to cause Shwachman-Diamond syndrome

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages 277-290

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2018893404

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2014-06807]
  2. INSERM
  3. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisee La Ligue)
  4. GIS-Institut des maladies rares
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche under Investissements d'avenir program [ANR-10-IAHU-01]
  6. Bloodwise [12048]
  7. UK Medical Research Council [MC_ U105161083, MC_UP_A390_1106, 1330931]
  8. Wellcome Trust [100140]
  9. Medical Research Council
  10. Connor Wright Shwachman Diamond Project
  11. Cambridge National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  12. MRC [MR/L003368/1, MC_UP_A390_1106, MC_U105161083] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Swedish Research Council [2014-06807] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is a recessive disorder typified by bone marrow failure and predisposition to hematological malignancies. SDS is predominantly caused by deficiency of the allosteric regulator Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome that cooperates with elongation factor-like GTPase 1 (EFL1) to catalyze release of the ribosome antiassociation factor eIF6 and activate translation. Here, we report biallelic mutations in EFL1 in 3 unrelated individuals with clinical features of SDS. Cellular defects in these individuals include impaired ribosomal subunit joining and attenuated global protein translation as a consequence of defective eIF6 eviction. In mice, Efl1 deficiency recapitulates key aspects of the SDS phenotype. By identifying biallelic EFL1 mutations in SDS, we define this leukemia predisposition disorder as a ribosomopathy that is caused by corruption of a fundamental, conserved mechanism, which licenses entry of the large ribosomal subunit into translation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available