4.6 Article

Evaluation of productive biofilms for continuous lactic acid production

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 116, Issue 10, Pages 2687-2697

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27080

Keywords

lactic acid production; long-term fermentation; magnetic resonance imaging; productive biofilm; simulation; tubular biofilm reactor

Funding

  1. German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water (DVGW)
  2. DFG
  3. Freundeskreis des Engler-Bunte-Instituts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In white biotechnology research, the putative superiority of productive biofilms to conventional biotransformation processes based on planktonic cultures has been increasingly discussed in recent years. In the present study, we chose lactic acid production as a model application to evaluate biofilm potential. A pure culture of Lactobacillus bacteria was grown in a tubular biofilm reactor. The biofilm system was cultivated monoseptically in a continuous mode for more than 3 weeks. The higher cell densities that could be obtained in the continuous biofilm system compared with the planktonic culture led to a significantly increased space-time yield. The productivity reached 80% of the maximum value 10 days after start-up and no subsequent decline was observed, confirming the suitability of the system for long-term fermentation. The analysis of biofilm performance revealed that productivity increases with the flow velocity. This is explained by the reduced retention time of the liquid phase in the reactor, and, thus, a minor pH drop caused by the released lactic acid. At low flow velocities, the pH drops to a value where growth and production are significantly inhibited. The biofilm was visualized by magnetic resonance imaging to analyze biofilm thickness. To deepen the understanding of the biofilm system, we used a simple model for cell growth and lactic acid production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available