4.8 Review

Microalgae-based wastewater treatment for nutrients recovery: A review

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121934

Keywords

Microalgae cultivation; Wastewater treatment; Nutrients recovery; Biomass production; Water reuse

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51768043]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622106]
  3. Science Foundation for Youths of Jiangxi Province, China [20171BAB216037]
  4. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Jiangxi Province, China [GJJ160214]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ17C030001]
  6. Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department [Y201840278]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water resource crisis and concerns with environmental pollution are pushing for upgrading of conventional wastewater treatment process. Microalgae-based wastewater treatment process has shown many advantages that can meet the new demand for improved wastewater treatment. However, considering the issues related to the complexity of wastewater characteristics and adaptability of microalgae species, and the challenges to the design and optimization of treatment processes in order to achieve higher removal efficiencies with lower costs, further exploration and research are still needed. This review provides an overview of microalgae strains commonly used for wastewater treatment, physical and chemical properties of various wastewaters and their suitability for algae cultivation, factors affecting algae growth, nutrient assimilation/removal and biomass productivity. The design and operation of microalgae-based wastewater treatment processes are also discussed. Moreover, the issues and limitations of microalgae-based wastewater treatment are also discussed and suggestions are proposed for the further research and development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available