4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

GkmExplain: fast and accurate interpretation of nonlinear gapped k-mer SVMs

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 35, Issue 14, Pages I173-I182

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz322

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. HHMI International Student Research fellowship
  2. Bio-X Bowes fellowship
  3. National Institute of Health [1DP2GM123485, 1U01HG009431, 1R01HG00967401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Support Vector Machines with gapped k-mer kernels (gkm-SVMs) have been used to learn predictive models of regulatory DNA sequence. However, interpreting predictive sequence patterns learned by gkm-SVMs can be challenging. Existing interpretation methods such as deltaSVM, in-silico mutagenesis (ISM) or SHAP either do not scale well or make limiting assumptions about the model that can produce misleading results when the gkm kernel is combined with nonlinear kernels. Here, we propose GkmExplain: a computationally efficient feature attribution method for interpreting predictive sequence patterns from gkm-SVM models that has theoretical connections to the method of Integrated Gradients. Using simulated regulatory DNA sequences, we show that GkmExplain identifies predictive patterns with high accuracy while avoiding pitfalls of deltaSVM and ISM and being orders of magnitude more computationally efficient than SHAP. By applying GkmExplain and a recently developed motif discovery method called TF-MoDISco to gkm-SVM models trained on in vivo transcription factor (TF) binding data, we recover consolidated, non-redundant TF motifs. Mutation impact scores derived using GkmExplain consistently outperform deltaSVM and ISM at identifying regulatory genetic variants from gkm-SVM models of chromatin accessibility in lymphoblastoid cell-lines. Availability and implementation Code and example notebooks to reproduce results are at https://github.com/kundajelab/gkmexplain. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available