4.3 Article

circ-NOTCH1 acts as a sponge of miR-637 and affects the expression of its target gene Apelin to regulate gastric cancer cell growth

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 164-170

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2019-0079

Keywords

circRNA; miR-637; Apelin; gastric cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and has a low survival rate, low cure rate, high recurrence rate, and poor prognosis. Recent studies have indicated that circular RNAs (circRNAs) have important functions in the occurrence and progression of GC. Studies on circ-NOTCH1, which was shown to be highly expressed in GC, have indicated that miR-637 binds to circ-NOTCH1 at multiple sites, and a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay further confirmed that miR-637 indeed targeted circ-NOTCH1 and Apelin. Circ-NOTCH1 and Apelin are highly expressed in GC cells and tissues, whereas the expression of miR-637 is reduced. Circ-NOTCH1 and miR-637 do not regulate each other's expression levels, but circ-NOTCH1significantly upregulates the expression of the miR-637 target gene Apelin, whereas miR-637 inhibites the expression of Apelin. Examination of GC cells showed that circ-NOTCH1 enhances cell proliferation and invasiveness, and reduces cell apoptosis; these effects were reversed by miR-637, which could terminate the above effects of circ-NOTCH1. When co-transfected with the circ-NOTCH1 overexpression plasmid and Apelin siRNAs, there were no obvious changes to the levels of cell proliferation, apoptosis, or invasiveness. Therefore, in GC cells, circ-NOTCH1 inhibits the transcriptional activity of miR-637, thereby upregulating the expression of its target gene Apelin and regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and invasiveness. This finding provides more experimental evidence for the function of circRNA in GC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available