4.7 Article

Ionic liquid grafted polyamide 6 as porous membrane materials: Enhanced water flux and heavy metal adsorption

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 481, Issue -, Pages 1435-1441

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.111

Keywords

Designed porous membrane material; Ionic liquid grafted polyamide 6; Hydrophilicity; Enhanced water flux; Heavy metal adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21674033, 51473183]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LD19E030001]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0307704]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Key RD Program [2018C01038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The design and preparation of new membrane material are of great importance. In this work, a hydrophilic ionic liquid (IL) grafted polyamide 6 (PA6) (IL-g-PA6) porous membrane materials were designed and prepared via radiation induced grafting method. The improved hydrophilicity, solubility and the unique ion structure of IL-g-PA6 made it suitable to prepare porous membrane using simple immersion precipitation phase inversion method. SEM images showed opened sponge-like pores for both PA6 and IL-g-PA6 porous membranes, while the pore size decreased and porosity increased as ionic liquid was grafted on PA6. It is believed that the mass transfer process was slowed down by enhanced hydrophilicity and solubility of IL-g-PA6, which lead to a different porous structure from that of PA6. Besides, even though the pore size of 2%-50 K membrane was much smaller, the water flux of which was 2.6 times higher than that of PA6 membrane. Moreover, the chromate sorption on 8%-50 K membrane was 2.7 times higher than that of PA6 membrane, which implies that the IL-g-PA6 porous membranes are good sorbent for heavy metal ions. The special interaction between grafted ionic liquid and heavy metal ions would account for the excellent adsorption property.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available