4.5 Article

Selection of the optimal bands of first-derivative fluorescence characteristics for leaf nitrogen concentration estimation

Journal

APPLIED OPTICS
Volume 58, Issue 21, Pages 5720-5727

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/AO.58.005720

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0504500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41801268]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2018CFB272]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. China University of Geosciences, Wuhan [CUG170661, CUGQY1947]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser-induced fluorescence technology provides a nondestructive and rapid method for monitoring leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) based on its optical characteristics. Crop growth status can be efficiently diagnosed and quality evaluated by monitoring LNC. In this study, the first-derivative fluorescence spectrum (FDFS) was proposed and calculated based on the fluorescence spectra excited by 355, 460, and 556 nm excitation lights for rice LNC estimation. Then, the performance of each band FDFS characteristics and the FDFS ratio for LNC estimation were comprehensively discussed using principal component analysis and backpropagation neural network (BPNN). We analyzed the number of FDFS characteristic's influence on the accuracy of LNC monitoring. Results showed that R-2 does not clearly improve for the LNC monitoring based on the BPNN model when the number of extracted FDFS features exceeds 4 or 5. Therefore, the FDFS optimal band combination of different excitation light wavelengths mentioned was selected for LNC monitoring. The selected band combinations contained the majority of FDFS characteristics and could effectively be applied in monitoring LNC (for 355, 460, and 556 nm excitation lights, with R-2 of 0.764, 0.625, and 0.738, respectively) based on the BPNN model. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available