4.8 Article

Is the autophagy a friend or foe in the silver nanoparticles associated radiotherapy for glioma ?

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 47-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.033

Keywords

Silver nanoparticles; Autophagy; Glioma; Radiotherapy; Radiation sensitization; Cell signaling pathways

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB933904, 2011CB933500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51201034]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61127002]
  4. NSFC [61420106012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malignant glioma is the most common intracranial tumor with a dismal prognosis. The radiosensitizing effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on glioma both in vitro and in vivo had been demonstrated in the previous studies of our group. However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear. Consistent with previous studies, a size and dose dependent antitumor effect and significant radiosensitivity enhancing effect of AgNPs were observed in our experiment system. We also found that cell protective autophagy could be induced by AgNPs and/or radiation, which was verified by the use of 3-MA. The mechanism through which had autophagy and the enhancement of radiosensitivity taken place was further investigated with inhibitors of ERK and JNK pathways. We demonstrated that ERIC and JNK played pivotal roles in the radiosensitivity enhancement. Inhibiting ERIC and JNK with U0126 and SP600125 respectively, we found that the autophagy level of the cells treated with AgNPs and radiation were attenuated. Moreover, SP600125 down-regulated the apoptosis rate of the co-treated cells significantly. Taken together, the present study would have important impact on biomedical applications of AgNPs and clinical treatment for glioma. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available