4.7 Article

HIV shock and kill therapy: In need of revision

Journal

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 19-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.03.008

Keywords

HIV latency; Shock and kill therapy; Block and lock therapy; Latency-reversing agents; Drug discovery; Viral reservoirs

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades of Spain [BFU2017-82805-C2-1-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implementation of antiretroviral therapy 23 years ago has rendered HIV infection clinically manageable. However, the disease remains incurable, since it establishes latent proviral reservoirs, which in turn can stochastically begin reproducing viral particles throughout the patient's lifetime. Viral latency itself depends in large part on the silencing environment of the infected host cell, which can be chemically manipulated. Shock and kill therapy intends to reverse proviral quiescence by inducing transcription with pharmaceuticals and allowing a combination of antiretroviral therapy, host immune clearance and HIV-cytolysis to remove latently infected cells, leading to a complete cure. Over 160 compounds functioning as latency-reversing agents (LRAs) have been identified to date, but none of the candidates has yet led to a promising functional cure. Furthermore, fundamental bioinformatic and clinical research from the past decade has highlighted the complexity and highly heterogeneous nature of the proviral reservoirs, shedding doubt on the shock and kill concept. Alternative therapies such as the HIV transcription-inhibiting block and lock strategy are therefore being considered. In this review we describe the variety of existing classes of LRAs, discuss their current drawbacks and highlight the potential for combinatorial shocktail therapies for potent proviral reactivation. We also suggest investigating LRAs with lesser-known mechanisms of action, and examine the feasibility of block and lock therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available