4.5 Article

Uncertainty quantification of sodium-cooled fast reactor based on the UAM-SFR benchmarks: From pin-cell to full core

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 433-442

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.01.033

Keywords

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis; Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor; MOX fuel; Metallic fuel; Uncertainty propagation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11775170, 11735011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To quantify the uncertainties in the neutronics calculations of sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR), a series of sensitivity and uncertainty (S&U) analysis were performed on two typical SFRs, which were a large-size MOX-fueled core and a medium-size metallic fueled core. The analysis was done from the pin-cell level to full core level to investigate the uncertainty propagation in the two-step neutronics calculation scheme. The responses analyzed contained the k(inf) , homogenized cross-sections, sodium void reactivity (SVR), Doppler constant (K-D) and control rod worth (CRW) at the sub-assembly level, and the k(inf) and power distribution at the full core level. The direct numerical perturbation method was used to get the relative sensitivity coefficients and the 'Sandwich Rule' was used to get the relative uncertainties. The results showed that the relative uncertainties propagated linearly from pin-cell to full core for the k(inf) and k(eff) . Relative uncertainties of reactivity like SVR were much bigger than the ones of k(inf) and k(eff). However, the relative uncertainty of power distribution was smaller than other responses. Differences were observed in the S&U analysis between the MOX fueled and metallic fueled SFRs. Softer spectrum of the large-size MOX fueled core caused bigger uncertainty compared to the metallic fueled core. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available