4.8 Article

Perylene π-Bridges Equally Delocalize Anions and Cations: Proportioned Quinoidal and Aromatic Content

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 58, Issue 41, Pages 14467-14471

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201905657

Keywords

aromaticity; conjugation; radicals; redox chemistry; structure elucidation

Funding

  1. DGI (Spain) [MAT2016-80826-R, CTQ2016-80030-R]
  2. GenCat - DGR (Catalunya) [2017-SGR-918]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in RD [SEV-2015-0496]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2015-69391-P, PGC2018-098533-B-100]
  5. Juan de la Cierva-Formacion 2015 programme - MINECO [FJCI-2015-23577]
  6. DAAD through the Research Grants-Short-Term Grants, 2017 programme [91673720]
  7. Ministry of Education Tier 3 program [MOE2014-T3-1-004]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GRK 2112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A complete experimental and theoretical study has been carried out for aromatic and quinoidal perylene-based bridges substituted with bis(diarylamine) and bis(arylimine) groups respectively. The through-bridge inter-redox site electronic couplings (V-AB) have been calculated for their respective mixed-valence radical cation and radical anion species. The unusual similitudes of the resulting V-AB values for the given structures reveal the intervention of molecular shapes with balanced semi-quinoidal/semi-aromatic structures in the charge delocalization. An identical molecular object equally responding to the injection of either positive or negative charges is rare in the field of organic pi-conjugated molecules. However, once probed herein for perylene-based systems, it can be extrapolated to other pi-conjugated bridges. As a result, this work opens the door to the rational design of true ambipolar bulk and molecular conductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available