4.6 Article

Validation of the Oxford WebQ Online 24-Hour Dietary Questionnaire Using Biomarkers

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 10, Pages 1858-1867

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz165

Keywords

dietary assessment; diet questionnaires; Million Women Study; nutrition assessment; recall; recovery biomarkers; UK Biobank; validation

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council grant [MRC G1100235]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator award
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  4. Public Health England (PHE) [MR/L01341X/1]
  5. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Health Impact of Environmental Hazards [HPRU-2012-10141]
  6. NIHR Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre
  7. Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust
  8. MRC [MR/L02019X/1]
  9. ESRC [ES/L011891/1, ES/S007164/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MR/L01341X/1, G1100235, MR/L02019X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall against biomarkers for protein, potassium, and total sugar intake and total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry. We recruited 160 participants in London, United Kingdom, between 2014 and 2016 and measured their biomarker levels at 3 nonconsecutive time points. The measurement error model simultaneously compared all 3 methods. Attenuation factors for protein, potassium, total sugar, and total energy intakes estimated as the mean of 2 applications of the Oxford WebQ were 0.37, 0.42, 0.45, and 0.31, respectively, with performance improving incrementally for the mean of more measures. Correlation between the mean value from 2 Oxford WebQs and estimated true intakes, reflecting attenuation when intake is categorized or ranked, was 0.47, 0.39, 0.40, and 0.38, respectively, also improving with repeated administration. These correlations were similar to those of the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based recall. Using objective biomarkers as the standard, the Oxford WebQ performs well across key nutrients in comparison with more administratively burdensome interviewer-based 24-hour recalls. Attenuation improves when the average value is taken over repeated administrations, reducing measurement error bias in assessment of diet-disease associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available