4.7 Article

Bioinformatics strategy to advance the interpretation of Alzheimer's disease GWAS discoveries: The roads from association to causation

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1048-1058

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.014

Keywords

Late-onset Alzheimer's disease; GWAS; CTCF; Chromatin state segmentation; Virtual circular chromosomal conformation capture (4C); BIN1; PICALM; CELF1

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Aging (NIH/NIA) [R01 AG057522]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) discovered multiple late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD)-associated SNPs and inferred the genes based on proximity; however, the actual causal genes are yet to be identified. Methods: We defined LOAD-GWAS regions by the most significantly associated SNP +/- 0.5 Mb and developed a bioinformatics pipeline that uses and integrates chromatin state segmentation track to map active enhancers and virtual 4C software to visualize interactions between active enhancers and gene promoters. We augmented our pipeline with biomedical and functional information. Results: We applied the bioinformatics pipeline using three similar to 1 Mb LOAD-GWAS loci: BIN1, PICALM, CELF1. These loci contain 10-24 genes, an average of 106 active enhancers and 80 CTCF sites. Our strategy identified all genes corresponding to the promoters that interact with the active enhancer that is closest to the LOAD-GWAS-SNP and generated a shorter list of prioritized candidate LOAD genes (5-14/loci), feasible for post-GWAS investigations of causality. Discussion: Interpretation of LOAD-GWAS discoveries requires the integration of brain-specific functional genomic data sets and information related to regulatory activity. (C) 2019 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available