4.8 Article

The preferential oxidation of CO in hydrogen rich streams over platinum doped nickel oxide catalysts

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 687-697

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.012

Keywords

Nickel oxide/alumina; Platinum/alumina; Preferential oxidation; Carbon monoxide and hydrogen

Funding

  1. HySA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NiO/Al2O3, Pt/Al2O3 and Pt/NiO/Al2O3 catalysts were prepared by the incipient wetness technique with a Ni loading of 25 wt% and Pt loading of 0.5 wt%. These catalysts were characterized by ICP-OES, XRD, BET, TPR, N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, CO chemisorption, FTIR-CO, PS, SEM-EDX and TEM. XRD and XPS results of the catalysts showed the presence of NiO and PtO phases on the respective supports and in situ redox reactions showed that the catalysts underwent reversible phase changes (oxide and metallic) that were stable. FTIR-CO studies showed that the Pt containing samples exhibited both linear and bridged CO adsorption with higher intensities observed for the Pt/NiO/Al2O3 catalyst. The catalysts were tested for the oxidation of CO in H-2 rich streams (preferential oxidation-PROX) in a continuous flow fixed bed stainless steel reactor. The NiO/Al2O3 catalyst produced very low conversions of CO in the stipulated PROX temperature range and showed highest conversion of 11% with a selectivity of 25% toward CO2. The Pt/Al2O3 catalyst showed improved activity within the PROX temperature range with highest CO conversion of 56% and selectivity toward CO2 of 68% at 200 degrees C. The Pt/NiO/Al2O3 catalyst revealed synergistic effects, obtaining much higher CO conversions within the PROX temperature ranges compared to both the mono-metallic catalysts. The highest CO conversion, of 99.9%, for this catalyst was at 200 degrees C, with a selectivity of 72.8% toward CO2 using a C:O-2 ratio of 1:2. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available