4.8 Article

Dual coke deactivation pathways during the catalytic cracking of raw bio-oil and vacuum gasoil in FCC conditions

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 336-346

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.044

Keywords

Biomass pyrolysis; Bio-oil; Fluid catalytic cracking; Coke deactivation; HY zeolite

Funding

  1. EFDR funds [CTQ2009-12800, CTQ2012-35192, CTQ2013-46172-P]
  2. Basque Government [IT748-13]
  3. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) [UFI 11/39]
  4. [BES-2010-032184]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coke deposition pathways have been studied during the fluid catalytic cracking of bio-oil, vacuum gasoil (VGO) and a blend of the previous two (80 wt%VGO and 20 wt% bio-oil), under realistic riser conditions of the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, using a commercial catalyst at 500 degrees C and contact times of 1.5-10 s. Amount and composition of soluble and insoluble coke in dichloromethane have been analyzed using a set of techniques (TPO, FTIR, C-13 NMR, XPS, Raman GC-MS and MALDI-TOF MS, among others). The relationship of coke deposition with its composition and the reaction medium has allowed us to set two pathways of coke formation: (i) heavy hydrocarbon pathway tend to form ordered polycondensed aromatic nanostructures; whereas (ii) oxygenate pathway tend to form a lighter fraction of coke containing oxygen, less ordered and more aliphatic coke. A synergy between the two pathways have been verified due to the lower coke deposition of the blend compared to the individual components, and this has been explained in terms of (i) attenuation of the heavy hydrocarbon pathway caused by the steam contained or originated from the bio-oil, and (ii) the hydride transfer from hydrocarbons to the precursors of the oxygenate pathway. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available