4.8 Article

Nitrogen Vacancies on 2D Layered W2N3: A Stable and Efficient Active Site for Nitrogen Reduction Reaction

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 32, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902709

Keywords

2D materials; ammonia; electrocatalysis; nitrogen reduction; nitrogen vacancy

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP160100927] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  2. Australian Research Council [FL170100154, DE160101163, LP160100927, DP160104866, DP170104464] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) under ambient conditions provides an avenue to produce carbon-free hydrogen carriers. However, the selectivity and activity of NRR are still hindered by the sluggish reaction kinetics. Nitrogen Vacancies on transition metal nitrides are considered as one of the most ideal active sites for NRR by virtue of their unique vacancy properties such as appropriate adsorption energy to dinitrogen molecule. However, their catalytic performance is usually limited by the unstable feature. Herein, a new 2D layered W2N3 nanosheet is prepared and the nitrogen vacancies are demonstrated to be active for electrochemical NRR with a steady ammonia production rate of 11.66 +/- 0.98 mu g h(-1) mg(cata)(-1) (3.80 +/- 0.32 x 10(-11) mol cm(-2) s(-1)) and Faradaic efficiency of 11.67 +/- 0.93% at -0.2 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode for 12 cycles (24 h). A series of ex situ synchrotron-based characterizations prove that the nitrogen vacancies on 2D W2N3 are stable by virtue of the high valence state of tungsten atoms and 2D confinement effect. Density function theory calculations suggest that nitrogen vacancies on W2N3 can provide an electron-deficient environment which not only facilitates nitrogen adsorption, but also lowers the thermodynamic limiting potential of NRR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available