4.8 Review

An Overview of Fiber-Shaped Batteries with a Focus on Multifunctionality, Scalability, and Technical Difficulties

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902151

Keywords

batteries; fiber-shaped; multifunctionality; technical difficulties; wearable

Funding

  1. GRF [CityU 11305218]
  2. Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20170818103435068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible and wearable energy storage devices are receiving increasing attention with the ever-growing market of wearable electronics. Fiber-shaped batteries display a unique 1D architecture with the merits of superior flexibility, miniaturization potential, adaptability to deformation, and compatibility with the traditional textile industry, which are especially advantageous for wearable applications. In the recent research frontier in the field of fiber-shaped batteries, in addition to higher performance, advances in multifunctional, scalable, and integrable systems are also the main themes. However, many difficulties exist, including difficult encapsulation and installation of separators, high internal resistance, and poor durability. Herein, the design principles (e.g., electrode preparation and battery assembly) and device performance (e.g., electrochemical and mechanical properties) of fiber-shaped batteries, including lithium-based batteries, zinc-based batteries, and some other representative systems, are summarized, with a focus on multifunctional devices with environmental adaptability, stimuli-responsive properties, and scalability up to energy textiles, with the hope of enlightening future research directions. Finally, technical challenges in the realistic wearable application of these batteries are also discussed with the aim of providing possible solutions and new insights for further improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available