4.8 Article

Importance of the oxygen bond strength for catalytic activity in soot oxidation

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 235-244

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.068

Keywords

Soot oxidation; Oxygen bond strength; Heat of chemisorption; Volcano curve; Bronsted-Evans-Polanyi relationship

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research (DSF) [2106-08-0039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxygen bond strength on a catalyst, as measured by the heat of oxygen chemisorption, is observed to be a very important parameter for the activity of the catalyst in soot oxidation. With both intimate contact between soot and catalyst (tight contact) and with the solids stirred loosely together (loose contact) the rate constants for a number of catalytic materials outline a volcano curve when plotted against their heats of oxygen chemisorption. However, the optima of the volcanoes correspond to different heats of chemisorption for the two contact situations. In both cases the activation energies for soot oxidation follow linear Bronsted-Evans-Polanyi relationships with the heat of oxygen chemisorption. Among the tested metal or metal oxide catalysts Co3O4 and CeO2 were nearest to the optimal bond strength in tight contact oxidation, while Cr2O3 was nearest to the optimum in loose contact oxidation. The optimum of the volcano curve in loose contact is estimated to occur between the bond strengths of alpha-Fe2O3 and alpha-Cr2O3. Guided by an interpolation principle FeaCrb Ox binary oxides were tested, and the activity of these oxides was observed to pass through an optimum for an FeaCr2Ox binary oxide catalyst, which exhibited a rate constant at 550 degrees C that was 2.3 times higher than the one for pure alpha-Cr2O3 and 29 times higher than the one for pure alpha-Fe2O3. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available