4.8 Article

Iron phthalocyanine-graphene donor-acceptor hybrids for visible-light-assisted degradation of phenol in the presence of H2O2

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 182-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.047

Keywords

Iron (II) phthlocyanine; Graphene; Donor-acceptor system; Photocatalytic degradation; Phenol

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20973054, 21403053, U1404503, 21103042, 21471047]
  2. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents [15HASTIT043]
  3. Innovative Research Team from the University of Henan Province [16IRTSTHN015]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University from the Ministry of Education of China [PCS IRT1126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron(II) phthalocyanine (FePc) is immobilized on graphene sheets to form a graphene(G)/iron(II) phthalocyanine hybrid (G/FePc) by the pi-pi stacking method. The resultant hybrids are characterized by UV-vis absorption spectra, FTIR, Raman spectra, BET, TEM, SEM and XRD. The result suggests that the interaction between graphene and FePc follows a donor-acceptor mode and the loading of FePc on graphene sheets not only facilitates the dispersion of FePc on graphene but also promotes the exfoliation of the graphene sheets. These samples are tested for photocatalytic degradation of phenol under visible light irradiation (lambda >= 420 nm). And the photocatalytic activity of graphene, which is not presented when graphene individually acts on phenol, is greatly enhanced because of the pi-pi stacking interaction when FePc loaded on graphene. The G/FePc hybrid containing 25 wt.% FePc (G/FePc-0.25) exhibits the best photoactivity among the different loading content of FePc, whose degradation rate for phenol achieves 77.1% in the presence of H2O2 under visible light irradiation for 3 h. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available