4.8 Article

Artemisinin-Based Smart Nanomedicines with Self-Supply of Ferrous Ion to Enhance Oxidative Stress for Specific and Efficient Cancer Treatment

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 33, Pages 29490-29497

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b07390

Keywords

cancer; artemisinin; mesoporous silica; nanomedicine; reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775166]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province [BK20180026]
  3. Double First-Class University Project [CPU2018GF06, CPU2018GY32]
  4. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Though abundant researches report that artemisinin could inhibit cancer cell growth via generating toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), the therapeutic efficiency of artemisinin for cancer treatment is still limited owing to the insufficient intracellular ferrous ion and defensive effect of intracellular glutathione. Herein, we report a cathepsin B-controllable smart nanomedicine based on the structural and pharmacodynamic characteristics of artemisinin, which employed transferrin-peptide-modified mesoporous silica to codeliver artemisinin and buthionine-sulfoximine, a glutathione scavenger, into cancer cells. As a gatekeeper, the transferrin-peptide can not only target the cancer cells but also supply the extra ferrous iron to catalyze artemisinin to produce excessive ROS to kill cancer cells efficiently. Once the designed nanomedicine attack into lysosome of tumor cells, the cargos of nanomedicine can be released in the presence of cathepsin B to immediately activate self-amplification of oxidative stress by simultaneously elevating the levels of ROS and weakening the levels of glutathione. We anticipate that this rational design strategy provides innovative opportunities for artemisinin in the clinical application of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available