4.6 Article

Sulfur-doped graphitic carbon nitride decorated with zinc phthalocyanines towards highly stable and efficient photocatalysis

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 519, Issue -, Pages 107-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.03.033

Keywords

Carbon nitride; Sulfur doping; Zinc phthalocyanine; Photocatalysis

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150259]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Changzhou University [ZMF14020076]
  3. Research Funds of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Catalytic Materials and Technology [BM2012110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of sulfur-doped graphitic carbon nitride (g-CNS) materials were prepared by thermal condensation of a high-quality thiourea and melamine under air atmosphere. When zinc phthalocyanine (ZnTNPc) was combined with g-CNS, the photocatalytic performance of ZnTNPc/g-CNS was 4.4 times higher than that of pure ZnTNPc under visible irradiation. More importantly, the ZnTNPc/g-CNS composites exhibited higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methylene blue than ZnTNPc/g-C3N4 under the same conditions. Some typical scavengers were added to identify the active species in the photocatalytic oxidation process. Mott-Schottky curve reveals that the introduction of sulfur atoms in the graphitic carbon nitride not only narrows the band gap but also results in a downshift of the conduction band. The mechanism of the enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnTNPc/g-CNS is based on the synergetic effect between ZnTNPc and g-CNS, which causes a rapid photo induced charge separation and suppresses the possibility of recombination of electron-hole pairs. Our effects will provide a novel system to increase the number of active species participated in the photocatalytic process, and thus enhance the photocatalytic activity of carbon-based catalysts. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available